Every prop firm trader eventually asks the same question: FTMO or Funding Pips? Both firms are popular among funded traders, and both offer a path to a funded account. But the rules differ enough to affect your pass rate — if you don't know what to look for.

FTMO vs Funding Pips at a Glance

FTMO is one of the longest-standing and most reputable prop firms, with an extensive track record of payouts. It's known for its two-step evaluation (Challenge + Verification) and a strict but predictable rule set.

Funding Pips is newer but has grown quickly thanks to more flexible rules and multiple account types — including options with and without a minimum trading days requirement. For traders who want to scale quickly, this is an appealing alternative.

Drawdown and Risk Rules Compared

RuleFTMOFunding Pips
Max daily drawdown5%5%
Max total drawdown10%10%
Minimum trading daysVaries by programOften none (depends on account type)
Consistency ruleOnly on certain programsDepends on account type
Profit splitUp to 90%Up to 90%

Note: prop firm rules change regularly. Always check the current terms on the official website before purchasing an account — this article gives a general picture, not current contract terms.

Why the drawdown method matters more than the percentage

Both firms use similar percentages, but the difference lies in how drawdown is measured — from your starting balance, or trailing from your highest equity. A trailing drawdown is far stricter than a static one, regardless of the percentage attached to it. This is the detail most traders overlook when comparing firms.

Costs and Payout Structure

Evaluation entry costs are comparable in order of magnitude between both firms, depending on the chosen account size. The bigger difference lies in payout frequency: some Funding Pips programs offer shorter payout cycles than FTMO's standard schedule. For traders who want to see cash flow sooner, this can be a deciding factor.

Which Firm Fits Which Type of Trader?

Why the Firm Matters Less Than Your Discipline

Here's the uncomfortable truth: traders who keep failing challenges at FTMO also tend to fail at Funding Pips — and vice versa. The problem rarely lies in the firm's rules. It lies in overtrading after a loss, ignoring a daily loss limit, or increasing position size after a winning week.

Before switching to an "easier" firm, ask yourself: do I actually have data showing why I failed? Or am I guessing that the next firm will fix the problem? A trading journal that tracks your rule compliance, drawdown patterns and discipline score shows whether the problem is in the rules — or in your execution.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is FTMO or Funding Pips easier to pass?
Neither is "easier" in absolute terms — the rules differ. Funding Pips typically offers more flexible daily drawdown room on some account types compared to FTMO's stricter daily limit on certain programs. The real deciding factor is your discipline, not the firm.
Which firm has the best payout terms?
Both offer competitive profit splits (typically 80-90%). FTMO is known for a long track record and reliable payouts; Funding Pips positions itself with faster payout cycles on some programs. Always check current terms on the official site.
Can I use the same strategy at both firms?
Largely yes, but you need to adjust your risk-per-trade to each firm's specific drawdown rules. A strategy that fits one firm could be too aggressive for another with stricter daily limits.
Should I use multiple prop firms at once?
Some experienced traders spread risk across multiple firms once funded. For beginners this is not recommended — focus first on consistently passing one challenge.

Read also: How to choose the right prop firm · How to pass your prop firm challenge

Whichever firm you choose — track your discipline
Logify tracks your rule compliance, drawdown and discipline score automatically, no matter which prop firm you use.
Start free — try it for 14 days